“the natural way to better health”  
Home Page

Flax Hulls
Fortified Flax Hulls (with Broccoli Sprouts)

 Flax Hull ingredients 
Flax Hulls - Lignans
Lignans - What is it
Analysis of Flax Hulls
Vitamin B12 or Cobalamin
Flax Hulls - Metals Analysis


 Breast Cancer Info 
What is Breast Cancer
Who Gets Breast Cancer
Individual Risk Factors
Prolonged Estrogen Exposure
Breast Cellular Changes
Smoking Diet and Stress
Stages of Breast Cancer
The Lymph Nodes
What are Lymph and Lymph Nodes
Why are Lymph Nodes important?
Effect of Lignans on Breast Cancer


 Flax News 
Breast Cancer - reports and trials
Testimonies from producer
New Therapies for Psoriasis
HRT - a significant breast cancer risk
Importance of fibre in diet
Avoid HRT for menopause
Antibiotics may increase chances of Breast Cancer
ASA may cut breast cancer risk: study
Milk may lower colon cancer risk
Study cast doubt on soy as menopause aid
Warning over HRT long-term use
High Five for Fibre
Study shows Lignans help with hair loss
The First Steps to a Strong Immune System
Sulforaphane effective against H. Pylori
Sulforaphane - could fight Leukemia, cancers


Do vital drugs boost risk of breast cancer? - Antibiotics may increase chances

ROBSTEIN - Special to The Toronto Star

February 17, 2004

Antibiotic use is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer, a new study has found, raising the possibility that women who take the widely used medicines are more prone to one fo the most feared malignancies.

The first-of-its-kind study of more than 10,000 Washington state women concluded that those who used the most antibiotics had double the chances of being struck by breast cancer.

The US study also found that the increased risk was consistent for all forms of antibiotics and that the risk went up with the number of prescriptions.

But experts cautioned that the findings should not stop women from taking he often lifesaving drugs when they need them to treat infections. There could be other explanantions for the association, and much more research is needed before scientists can understand what the surprising results mean.

"This is not saying that women should stop taking antibiotics. Women should take antibiotics for infections," said Stephen Taplin, a senior scientist at the National Cancer Institute, who helped conduct the study.

"But we need to follow up and find out if this is a real association".

Nevertheless, the study was so well designed and the findings so striking it could mean antibiotics use is an important, previously unrecognised, risk factor for breast cancer, experts said.

Antibiotics could increase the risk for breast cancer by, for example, affecting the bacteria in the digestive system in ways that interfere with the metabolism of foods that protect against cancer, experts said. Another possibility is that antibiotics boost the risk by affecting the immune system or the body's inflammatory respnse.

Even if it turns out antibiotics do not increase the risk for breast cancer, the finding is liely to turn out to be important because it could lead to the discovery of whatever it is about women who use drugs that also appears to make them prone to the disease, researchers said. "This has opened up a picture that people had not been thinking about," Taplin said.

Until the results are sorted out, experts said, the findings provide yet another reason for doctors to more judiciously prescribe antibiotics, which are often used unnecessarily, especially for women who may be at risk for breast cancer for other reasons.

"It's a very provocative finding but it's not entirely clear what it means," Roberta Ness, an epidemiologist at the University of Pittsburgh, who co-authored an editorial accompanying the studyin this week's Journal of the American Medical Association. "I think a cautious interpretation is very reasonable."

The researchers took pains to try to find other explanations for the association, such as the possibility that women who take antibiotics are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer because they see doctors more often. But the association remained even after they excluded that and all of the other most likely possibilities.

The study's design, however, made it impossible to rule out the chances that women sho tend to use the medicines are somehow biologically predisposed to breast cancer for other reasons, such as by having weak immune systems or a hormonal imbalance that is the real cause of both their increased risk for breast cancer and for infections that prompted antibiotic use.

Scientists first proposed antibiotics may increase the risk for breast cancer in 1981. The only othe study to look at the question was in Finland in 2000. That study also found a link, but it was not as well designed, prompting the new research.

The researchers examined computerized pharmacy and cancer screening records of 2,266 women in Group Health Cooperative, a Seattle-area health plan, who developed breast cancer, and 7,953 similar women who did not get breast cancer.

Women who had more than 25 individual prescriptions for antibiotics over an average period of 17 years had twice the risk of breast cancer as those who had taken no antibiotics. The risk was lower for women who took fewer antibiotics, but even those who had between one and 25 prescriptions were about 1.5 times more likely to get breast cancer, the researchers found.

The study "raises as many questions as it answers," said Marilyn Schneider, executive director of the Canadian Breast Cancer Reserach Alliance.

"Does antibiotics use cause the cancer or are there other underlying factors causing it?" she asked. "Even more important .... is it due to the use of antibiotics or the conditions for which the antibiotics were prescribed in the first place?"

The good news to the study is that it has raised so many questions I am sure it will spur further research and hopefully Canadian research that will clarify and get at the causes." Schneider todl the Star's Elaine Carey.

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Canadian women, accounting for almost a third of all cancer cases. An estimated 21,100 women developed breast cancer last year and 5,300 died from it.

Recommended Osumex products:

LB17 "live" probiotic to help ensure that there is a good balance of friendly bacteria in the digestive system to help break down and absorb food consumed. It will ensure that the body gets all the essential nutrients

Concentrated Natural Organic Flax Hulls is a very good dietary fibre as it contains both soluble and insoluble fibres. It is totally natural and suitable for vegetarians as well as "raw foods" practitioners. In addition the Flax Hulls provide you with the recommended daily value of Vitamin B12. At the same time they contain lignans, which are great immune system boosters, reduces free radical activity in the body and support the prevention of prostate, bowel and breast cancers. Used with LB17 will ensure that the lignans are absorbed efficiently by the body and helps reduce gas and bloating usually associated with a high fibre diet.

See below for a sample of Fortified Flax Hulls (1st pic) and Flax Hulls (2nd pic)

Each jar contains 180gm of fortified flax hulls or 150gm of flax hulls

The above information is provided for general educational purposes only. It is not intended to replace competent health care advice received from a knowledgeable healthcare professional. You are urged to seek healthcare advice for the treatment of any illness or disease.
Health Canada and the FDA (USA) have not evaluated these statements. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

 Distributors - Nth America | Sth America | Asia | Europe | Africa | Oceania |  Contact
Copyright 2001-2016 Osumex Natural Alternatives Ltd. All rights reserved.